Father James Martin, S. Martin suggested such a focus constituted unjust discrimination. The kingdom of God is at hand.
Repent, and believe in the gospel. Citing canon law, the bishop said everyone conscious of grave sin should not receive Holy Communion without first going to confession and receiving absolution.
This is relevant to everyone who has committed a grave sin, whether it is sexual sin, missing Mass on Sundays and Holy Days of Obligation without grave cause, procuring an abortion, or having attempted remarriage after a divorce without obtaining a decree of nullity. The bishop noted that a couple who agrees to live as brother and sister in an irregular union, if there is no public scandal, could receive Holy Communion after repenting, going to confession, and amending their lives.
To the extent that the Framers would have recognized a natural right to marriage that fell within the broader definition of liberty, it would not have included a right to governmental recognition and benefits. As a result of this reasoning it was not until that the federal government lifted its ban on the employment of homosexual workers. Or, suppose that the same local college admitted self-acknowledged homosexuals to all degree-granting programs but carried them on all official college rosters, including the commencement program, under the exclusive heading of "evil" students. Eight of them grew up in east- and west-coast States. What did you think when you got off the plane?
This similarly would apply to two men or two women who live chastely with each outher. Burial rites were only one part of the June 12 decree, which concerned topics including the use of Catholic facilities and diocesan personnel in same-sex ceremonies, as well as the response to people in same-sex unions and to any children who live with such couples and are presented for the sacraments or Catholic education.
Washington D. Well, Mr. Mattson will have to deal with the consequences of sin, assuming the allegations are true. But he has apparently thoroughly repented, so I, for one, do not think any less of him today than I did yesterday.
Supreme Court, to this end. This would however be misleading. Section of the Indian penal code, which punishes sexual conduct "against the order of nature" with up to life imprisonment, is a British colonial-era law dating from Section is a direct product of Victorian social mores.
A man watches his long-time neighbor boy, Wesley, as the young man mows his lawn. He's watched the boy grow up into a young adult, always feeling a sexual. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for A Matter of Respect (Gay Briefs) at payproporimim.cf Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our.
The report demonstrates that British saw conquered cultures as morally lax on sexuality. British viceroy Lord Elgin warned that British soldiers could succumb to "replicas of Sodom and Gomorrah" as they acquired the "special Oriental vices.
The colonized needed compulsory re-education in sexual mores. Section unfortunately continues to be on the statute books seven decades after Indian independence, and even in , the Indian Supreme Court reversed an earlier Delhi High Court decision that had held section to be unconstitutional, on the grounds that this is a matter for the people and their elected representatives, not the courts. British leaders of the Victorian era acted against homosexual conduct based on their understanding of the famous Biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah 6 or the book of Leviticus 7 holding that homosexuals were, simply by virtue of that conduct, denied entry into heaven.
Colonial era attitudes towards LGBT rights have left a lasting impression on Hindu society in India and, by extension, on the American Hindu community, given that a majority of Hindus in the U.
The matter is further complicated by the fact that sexuality in general is frowned upon and rarely discussed openly in today's Indian society. However, Hinduism, given its central tenets, is in a strong theological position on the matter of LGBT rights.
Hindus will need to face the challenge of recognizing attitudes that are a result of a colonized mindset, lack of understanding, and other prejudices, and endeavor to place the issue of LGBT rights squarely within a careful understanding of the history and teachings of their ancient Hindu ethos. Nobody should face discrimination because of their sexual preferences. To be branded a criminal for this is absurd. A Hindu Approach to LGBT rights While the equal religio-spiritual potential of all individuals is key to understanding a Hindu basis for dignity for LGBT persons, so too is the way in which Hindu religious texts and teachings are approached.
What about marriage as a religious rite? One of the most shocking things about this whole story is that the contract which spelled out the agreement between the U. House leadership and the lawyers they retained included a provision denying all employees at the firm the right to express their views on DOMA or any pending legislation related to its repeal. No phone calls to their congressional representatives, no letters to the editor, no posts on Facebook.
Total silence is required. This is not just about contempt for gay people, but contempt for democracy and the fundamental right to petition the government for redress of grievance. This is about silencing opposition. This is America in We need the courts and impact litigation more than ever. When the President and Attorney General announced they would no longer defend DOMA in court, they also said they would continue to enforce it until ordered not to do so by the courts or until it is repealed by Congress.
Which do you think is going to happen first? I think the House leadership has made it very clear. The courts are the check on this abuse of power. And Lambda Legal will keep fighting in the courts until this is just a sorry memory.
Skip to main content. Search form Search. News Feed.